Driving Factors to Pursue Endocrinology Training Fellowship: Empirical Survey Data and Future Strategies.

OBJECTIVE: There is a current and anticipated labor shortage of endocrinologists in the United States. Over the past decade, the number of applications to endocrinology fellowship programs has plateaued despite increased available positions, and interest in endocrinology has declined relative to other internal medicine subspecialty fields. The examination of driving factors for pursuit of endocrinology as a subspecialty career is needed. METHODS: A 12-question online survey was developed to identify the primary reasons for current endocrinology fellows/trainees to pursue the field. This survey was sent to 152 U.S. endocrinology fellowship program directors for completion by their fellows between July and August 2021. RESULTS: A total of 176 of 629 fellows (28.0%) completed the survey. The majority (57.4%) had decided to pursue endocrinology as a career during residency, while 27.3% had decided during medical school. The endocrinology rotation during residency was ranked by 79 fellows (44.9%) as the most influential factor, followed by having positive experiences with a clinical mentor (27.3%). Endocrinology exposure during medical school was sparse, with only 2.8% noting the availability of an endocrinology student interest group, while 59.7% reported inadequate endocrinology exposure during their medical school curriculum. CONCLUSION: The majority of current endocrinology fellows/trainees report that exposure to the field during medical school was limited, and that their endocrinology elective and mentorship experiences during residency were the most influential factors for pursuing endocrinology as a subspecialty. Improved integration of endocrinology experiences between medical school and residency may enhance career interest in endocrinology.

Systems-Level Opportunities in the Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: An Informatics-based Assessment.

CONTEXT: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), a leading cause of hypercalcemia and secondary osteoporosis, is underdiagnosed. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to establish a foundation for an electronic medical record-based intervention that would prompt serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) assessment in patients with persistent hypercalcemia and identify care gaps in their management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary academic health system of outpatients with persistent hypercalcemia, who were categorized as having classic or normohormonal PHPT. Main outcome measures included the frequencies of serum PTH measurement in patients with persistent hypercalcemia, and their subsequent workup with bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, and ultimately, medical therapy or parathyroidectomy. RESULTS: Among 3151 patients with persistent hypercalcemia, 1526 (48%) had PTH measured, of whom 1377 (90%) were confirmed to have classic (49%) or normohormonal (41%) PHPT. PTH was measured in 65% of hypercalcemic patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis (P < .001). At median 2-year follow-up, bone density was assessed in 275 (20%) patients with either variant of PHPT (P = .003). Of women aged 50 years or older with classic PHPT, 95 (19%) underwent BMD assessment. Of patients with classic or normohormonal PHPT, 919 patients (67%) met consensus criteria for surgical intervention, though only 143 (15%) underwent parathyroidectomy. CONCLUSION: Within a large academic health system, more than half of patients with confirmed hypercalcemia were not assessed for PHPT, including many patients with preexisting bone disease. Care gaps in BMD assessment and medical or surgical therapy represent missed opportunities to avoid skeletal and other complications of PHPT.